Network operations room with data center racks and monitoring dashboards

About Arxima

Why Arxima Exists

Arxima was created for organizations that depend on custom and connected technology but do not want to build and manage a complete engineering organization.

The Problem We Set Out to Solve

As a business grows, it increasingly relies on custom applications, integrations, data workflows, infrastructure, employee systems, and security controls. Different internal teams and outside providers support each part, while no one is responsible for how the whole environment works together.

That gap slows changes, lets the same problems keep returning, and leaves important knowledge with one person. Business leaders end up coordinating technical work instead of focusing on customers, operations, and growth.

Our Role

Arxima is an engineering-led technology operations company. We bring software engineering, infrastructure, data, security, support, and day-to-day operation together around the systems a business depends on.

The role is not limited to recommending a technical direction. It includes carrying decisions into implementation and operating the resulting system under defined standards, access, processes, and accountability.

The model is supported by hands-on technical leadership experience across multi-server application stacks, Linux and virtual infrastructure, containers, automated delivery, distributed data, messaging, observability, backup, recovery, and performance improvement.

Our Leadership Team

Arxima's founders bring complementary responsibility across technology strategy, execution, client success, and managed service operations.

Yoel Weiner

Co-Founder Technology Strategy & Architecture

Yoel leads technology strategy and architecture across software, platforms, and infrastructure. His background as a software engineer, technical lead, and architect spans large-scale commerce applications.

His experience covers cloud-native and self-hosted environments, DevOps and delivery automation, containers and orchestration, distributed data systems, messaging, observability, and recovery. He focuses on system direction that remains practical through implementation and production operation.

LinkedIn Profile

Nissi Magid

Co-Founder Technology Execution & Client Success

Nissi leads technology execution and client success. His background includes software delivery, product ownership, application modernization, and ERP implementation.

He coordinates business stakeholders with engineering and operations teams, keeping priorities, responsibilities, and communication clear so technical direction moves through delivery and into day-to-day use.

LinkedIn Profile

Dov Gotlib

Co-Founder Director of Sales & MSP Operations

Dov leads sales and MSP operations, drawing on longstanding experience in IT support and managed services through ClickClick IT Services.

He has supported technology operations for large organizations with hundreds of users and endpoints. His role connects customer needs, service coordination, and day-to-day MSP delivery.

Common Situations

When Clear Technical Ownership Helps

Technology Is Taking Too Much Leadership Time

Custom software, data, and internal workflows have become essential to customers, revenue, or daily operations.

Clear ownership lets leaders return their attention to customers, operations, and growth.

Too Many People Own Separate Pieces

Freelancers, individual developers, software vendors, and IT providers each own part of the environment.

A controlled operating model replaces fragmented ownership with clear standards, authority, and accountability.

An Internal Technology Leader Needs More Depth

A Head of Technology or fractional CTO defines the direction without having every delivery and operating discipline in place.

Arxima adds the software, infrastructure, data, security, and operating depth needed to carry that direction forward.

What We Bring Together

The work crosses several technical areas because a decision in one area affects the others. These capabilities support one shared cycle: understand, build, operate, recover, and improve.

Software Operations

Software Engineering and Application Operations

Custom Software Development
Application Modernization
Systems Integration
Software Architecture and Technical Leadership
Application Support and Maintenance
Technical Debt Reduction

Platforms

Infrastructure and Platforms

Public, Private, Hybrid, and Bare-Metal Infrastructure
Cloud Architecture and Infrastructure Modernization
Containers and Platform Engineering
Infrastructure-as-Code and Deployment Automation
Availability, Capacity, and Recovery Design

Information Flow

Data and Integration

Database Design and Operations
Data and Application Integration
Workflow and Reporting Automation
Data Warehousing and Business Intelligence
Data Quality and Operational Visibility

Continuous Operation

Reliable System Operations

Application, Platform, and Database Operations
Monitoring, Logging, and Alerting
Incident Response and Problem Resolution
Release and Change Operations
Backup, Recovery, and Continuity
Security Maintenance and Vulnerability Remediation

User Operations

Managed IT and User Operations

User Support and Service Management
Endpoint and Device Lifecycle Management
Identity and Access Administration
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace Administration
Network Operations and User Security

Technical Ownership

Technology Leadership and Service Ownership

System Architecture and Technical Direction
Technical Prioritization and Investment Decisions
Vendor Coordination and Responsibility Mapping
Risk, Resilience, and Modernization Execution
Ongoing Service Ownership and Improvement

How We Work

Technology decisions lead to steady progress, not a new round of scoping, kickoff, and handoff every time. We order work by business value, risk, dependencies, and the issue currently slowing progress.

Useful changes move into production in measured steps. What happens after release helps decide what comes next, so delivery, support, and improvement stay connected instead of resetting with each project.

Start with the Business Priority: Understand the outcome, the people affected, the risks, and the limits before choosing a technical answer.
Improve the Limiting Constraint: Identify the dependency, bottleneck, or recurring failure limiting progress, then improve it before adding more work.
Deliver in Measured Steps: Move useful changes into production without making the entire effort depend on one large release or handoff.
Design for Day-to-Day Operation: Plan for deployment, monitoring, security, support, recovery, and future change while the system is being built.
Learn from What Happens in Production: Use incidents, support requests, system health, security findings, and user feedback to choose what to improve next.

Working Relationship

Start with One Important Problem

A first engagement is small enough to understand clearly and important enough to produce a useful result. The outcome, responsibilities, limits, and next decision are agreed before work begins.

Clear Scope. Clear Responsibility.

When continued responsibility helps, the relationship continues through support, operation, and improvement. A completed project also stands on its own.

Start a Conversation